September 24, 2026 · Orlando, Florida

Nolan’s phone: the full forensic briefing

Ben Crump, the Wells family’s legal team, and Garrett Discovery presented findings from their examination of Nolan Wells’s phone. Watch the conference from its opening remarks through the final question, then read the complete timecoded transcript.

Full conference · NewsNation camera feed · user-supplied recording, trimmed only before the first remarks and after the podium exit.September 24, 2026

Updated September 24, 2026 · Sources published after the briefing

New public sources and an important clarification

The full conference remains above. Later reporting adds a separate GPS reconstruction video, the state autopsy document, and a more specific account of the Snapchat deletions.

Garrett’s GPS reconstruction

WLOX published the video supplied by Andrew Garrett, synchronizing the phone’s movements with calls and messages. It is the redacted reconstruction, not the raw location records.

Watch the reconstruction on WLOX ↗

State autopsy · original document

TMZ’s four-page copy includes three report pages and a head-injury diagram. The report identifies case ME26-0514 and the July 7 examination.

Read the complete state report PDF

What the public evidence establishes

Deleted messages do not establish handset access

describe Snapchat material disappearing after Nolan’s last use and before the family retrieved the phone, with a user action required. In his September 23 letter, quoted by the Clarion Ledger via AOL, Garrett more specifically says messages sent to Nolan were unsent or deleted by their senders.

Associated Press reporting says the presentation did not establish that anyone unlocked the handset after it left the island and before the family recovered it. AP also says Garrett did not specify whether senders acted on their own devices and that it sought clarification from Crump’s team.

These are different technical questions: a sender removing a message they sent, a change reflected in the recipient’s account, and someone physically unlocking the recipient’s phone. The published remarks do not establish the last of those. The sender-side description may explain how deleted messages and a locked handset can coexist; the underlying artifacts are needed to establish the actual sequence. Neither account identifies an actor’s intent.

What was presented

Conference notes

These notes distinguish the speakers’ findings from records available for independent review.

  • — Crump described 282 pages of material supplied to the district attorney and read portions of a friend-group exchange without naming senders. The report inventory below distinguishes the findings report from the Snapchat report.
  • — Garrett said the phone copy took about 30 hours and that his team reconstructed Snapchat material standard tools did not parse. He described more than one million artifacts: digital records, not a count of photographs.
  • — Read the sender-side deletion qualification above alongside these remarks.
  • — Garrett said USB drives supplied to reporters contained the video and some reports. This does not identify which reports each outlet received or establish that they have published them.
  • — Garrett presented an unlock and app activity around 2:17–2:18 p.m. July 4 as Nolan’s last phone use. The underlying logs are not available on this page.
  • — The animation follows the phone to the mainland, including a boat-ramp point around 7:24 p.m. The device’s route does not by itself locate Nolan.

Primary document now available

State autopsy report

Read the complete four-page PDF, hosted by TMZ. Staci Turner, MD, examined Nolan on July 7; the report is dated August 17. Both cause and manner of death are classified as undetermined.

  • Page 2: two posterior subcutaneous scalp contusions, approximately two inches each; no external scalp injury, skull fracture, or described brain hemorrhage.
  • Page 3: No fluid or debris is within the airways. The stomach is empty. The same page describes approximately 100 mL of red-brown decomposition fluid in each chest cavity.
  • Page 4: a head diagram marks the two posterior injury locations.

— Attorney Liza Park interprets the airway passage more broadly as no water in the lungs. The report’s wording refers specifically to the airways. This page preserves that distinction and the medical examiner’s undetermined conclusion; it does not use the passage to establish or exclude drowning. Compare the independent autopsy.

Unresolved source differences

Times and delivery dates to reconcile

IssuePublished accountsWhat is still needed
Sea Tow · 12-minute difference4:36 p.m. in the reconstruction as reported by the Clarion Ledger; 4:48 p.m. on the counsel-produced phone-log exhibit preserved in the master notes.Original call metadata and the reconstruction’s event source. The existing 4:48 exhibit time remains recorded; the two times are not silently merged or substituted.
Final-report deliverySeptember 14 in Garrett’s letter as quoted by the Clarion Ledger; September 16 for Smith’s finalized-report email in WLOX’s correspondence release.Transmittal emails, attachment lists, versions, and receipt metadata. These may describe different delivery events; the dates alone do not settle what prosecutors possessed for a particular presentation.
Last traditional textAbout 8:30 p.m. July 3 in ; 11:30 p.m. in the Clarion Ledger account.The original message timestamp and timezone. This page uses 8:30 p.m. when describing the recorded statement, without treating it as an independently verified device timestamp.

Document status · September 24, 2026

The underlying phone records remain the gap

The grand jury release identifies the preliminary findings report and subsequent findings and Snapchat reports. Garrett’s letter also names a full artifact report. Whether that label describes a distinct file or an overlapping export remains to be checked against the deliverables. Read the quoted letter coverage.

The same coverage identifies Apple Health activity, last calls, app interactions, locations, databases, unified logs, knowledge databases, media caches, and notification records. The underlying records have not been obtained for this page.

  1. 21-page final Mobile Device Examination Findings: obtain the complete report and its supporting lock-state, screen, app, call, and location records.
  2. 261-page Snapchat Conversation Report: obtain the actual artifacts, timestamps, and explanation of deletion or unsending.
  3. Full artifact report: establish its filename, scope, relationship to the other reports, and whether it was delivered.
  4. Complete September 23 Garrett letter: the coverage quotes portions; the original letter is not included here.
  5. 14-page preliminary findings report: compare its scope and conclusions with the final findings.
  6. GPS source records: the redacted video is publicly viewable on WLOX; native coordinates, event sources, timezone handling, and the unredacted version are not included here.
  7. Forensic image / extraction and delivery manifest: establish precisely which files were acquired, supplied, and received.

These are records not obtained for this page, not a claim that no public copy exists anywhere. AP reports that the full message report was not released at the briefing. The media USB statement warrants checking press-packet contents, but does not establish public availability. AP coverage ↗

Complete recording transcript

Timecoded transcript

Times are relative to the trimmed video. Select a time to play that part of the conference. This transcript and the captions were generated from the audio and can contain errors, particularly in names, numbers, overlapping speech, and technical terms. The video is the controlling source.